<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Newstocks - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-fe4e2a8a" type="application/json"/><link>http://newstocks.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:11:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: It's a small world</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/03/its-a-small-world.html#comment-7898229</link><description>Indeed it's a small small world! just loved this video, thanks for sharing and keep coming with stuff like this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Medela</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Aidan's favourite rides at DisneyWorld</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/03/aidans-favourite-rides-at-disneyworld.html#comment-7042826</link><description>That's so funny! It reminds me of Ed- whenever we think we are providing him with new treat, he decides that the thing he is most interested in is a lightbulb...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jenny</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:15:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Aidan's favourite rides at DisneyWorld</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/03/aidans-favourite-rides-at-disneyworld.html#comment-6923549</link><description>Well, maybe I exagerrated a little. He did enjoy the playgrounds (particularly those that squirted water up in the air!) and Mickey's PhilharMagic, but most of the time he looked like he was a bit shellshocked by it all. I think he found a lot of it too loud.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">philwells</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:50:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Aidan's favourite rides at DisneyWorld</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/03/aidans-favourite-rides-at-disneyworld.html#comment-6915499</link><description>Hilarious!  I used to say there  must be something wrong with you if you did n't like Disney. I need to amend that and make allowances for the extremely young .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Grandma</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:17:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Term limits</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/02/term-limits.html#comment-6244570</link><description>Was just wondering the same thing myself.  Their arguments for it are in fact arguments against it.  The reputational risk that the policy causes far outweighs any public policy benefits (of which so far I haven't been convinced there is one.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">christian</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:45:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html#comment-6050868</link><description>Probably Cablevision's biggest bargaining tool where public opinion is concerned. They can legitimately claim to desire enhancements to television broadcasting from an options point of view (more channels, digital service, broadband).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bermuda Broadcasting, by its complete and utter abscence of any form of enhancement to its current offering over the past ten years, cannot claim this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tryangle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:04:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html#comment-5466556</link><description>Both BBC and Cablevision benefit from Cablevision retransmitting BBC's signal - BBC get more viewers, which makes the channels more attractive to advertisers, and Cablevision get a more attractive offering that helps keep their subscriber numbers up. Perhaps it was foolish of BBC to start charging for their content, but I see no reason why Cablevision couldn't just have carved those channels into a separate package and passed along the cost for those who wished to subscribe to it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both companies are as bad as each other. BBC are whiners who are unable or unwilling to move with the times, and Cablevision are disingenuous liars with little regard for their customers. Why say you removed 7 and 9 "for legal reasons" when this was clearly a willing choice?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-525426944</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:38:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html#comment-5462578</link><description>Superbowl is on NBC isn't it?  So it shouldn't be affected.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks to me like a good old standoff, who'll blink first.  BBC is hoping their advertisers don't walk, Cablevision is hoping people don't go to Wow.  Time will tell.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Personally, as many problems as I have with Cablevision, I hope they prevail because they can access far better quality feeds than BBC and could offer HD channels.  7 and 9 are unwatchable, over the air or otherwise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">christian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:04:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html#comment-5462343</link><description>I disagree.  This is clearly a financial shakedown by ZBM of Cablevision.  They are benefiting from the digital transmission on Cablevision's network versus their own dodgy over-the-air signal.  If they wish to charge for their content, Cablevision should be free to charge for the transmission.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Onion</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:52:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/suicide.html#comment-5456291</link><description>Silver lining for consumers - people planning Superbowl parties can plan accordingly and get their Plan B in motion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cablevision 'pulling the plug' at the time they did, clearly they didn' t have their subscribers' interests in heart.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tryangle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:11:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dungeons and dragons</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/dungeons-and-dragons.html#comment-5453049</link><description>Hey Henry, good to hear from you again. My alt, Ilaridel, is on Skullcrusher too, but I'm exclusively playing my priest on Azjol-Nerub at the moment. Add me to your friends list and feel free to give me a shout if you see me on, though!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">philwells</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:15:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dungeons and dragons</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/dungeons-and-dragons.html#comment-5449356</link><description>Phil,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sorry to hear you went back to world of warcrack.  I quit cold turkey for 3 months but the expansion lured me back too. On Skullcrusher (pvp) I got my lock to 80, now my Death Knight is 68 and I have acquired a bit of spouse aggro . . . .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I saw the D&amp;D title there, and wanted to tell you that there is a new gaming forum for Bermuda, &lt;a href="http://www.bdagaming.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.bdagaming.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy New year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Henry</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">henry</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:23:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You're hopeless, but we'd still vote for you</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/youre-hopeless-but-wed-still-vote-for-you.html#comment-5251805</link><description>Surely you're not saying that no-one has any right to complain about the UBP unless they get involved in the party themselves? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I don't like the way the PLP is governing the country, am I not entitled to complain unless I join the PLP and try to change it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I don't like the lack of choice in Bermuda's stores, can I not complain about it unless I set up my own business?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Perhaps the people actually in the UBP (such as yourself) need to have a hard think about why so many of your core voters are unhappy with you and do something about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">philwells</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:17:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You're hopeless, but we'd still vote for you</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/youre-hopeless-but-wed-still-vote-for-you.html#comment-5251416</link><description>Oh quit whining.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bitching and moaning without making a contribution is the reason that the UBP is dissatisfying.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:45:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Idiot</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2009/01/idiot.html#comment-4987049</link><description>unfortuately I don't think those guys read or watch the news. Nothing has changed the mindset of the people who overtake blindly, tailgate, etc. They ride along confident that traffic will always yield to them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tryangle</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:48:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Death on the roads</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/12/death-on-the-roads.html#comment-4810699</link><description>So what's the problem? Politicians worried about public opposition, or a legal system incapable of processing all the fines that would result?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">philwells</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:24:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Death on the roads</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/12/death-on-the-roads.html#comment-4805306</link><description>Speed cameras were "top of the agenda" when the UBP lost the election back in 1998.  And had been stalled there for some time!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chug</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:48:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to Azeroth</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/12/back-to-azeroth.html#comment-4694798</link><description>Oh I hope my 20 year old who is suppose to be focusing on college doesn't get the expansion.   I am allowing myself to believe that he does not spend all night playing WOW while he is pursuing his education....but I can't help thinking -- once a WOW addict, always a WOW addict.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Monique</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:57:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Top 10 games</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/09/top-10-games.html#comment-4291577</link><description>Just realised I missed the stellar "Mafia" off this list. Think I'd probably slot that in at number 3, pushing WoW and everything behind it back one position. What an omission!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">philwells</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/12/vote-for-marc-bean.html</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/12/vote-for-marc-bean.html#comment-4170043</link><description>I bet he didn't expect the neo-fascist endorsement.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">christian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New PC</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/12/new-pc.html#comment-4169369</link><description>Yeah, I started thinking along the same lines myself. But the hard drive actually turned out to be OK and the monitor problem doesn't look like something that would be caused by a power problem (more likely a small crack in the circuit board).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">philwells</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:13:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New PC</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/12/new-pc.html#comment-4087149</link><description>So you toasted a PC, monitor, and now a back drive &amp; you haven't checked your power source yet for funky fluctuations??  Yikes!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Somers</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:54:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Local recommendations</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/12/local-recommendations.html#comment-4086329</link><description>I've enjoyed that place as well, though some people give it mixed reviews.  I chalk it up to being new.  I've recently thought about a food blog...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">D. Fresh</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:59:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What a contrast</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/11/what-a-contrast.html#comment-4055268</link><description>I agree with you 100%.  His rant was out of place and makes both overseas governments and our business partners wonder about the quality of our leadership.  Bermudians don't want independence.  Does he really think that going drama queen about it all the time is going to bring us running?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phizzy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guitar Hero III</title><link>http://www.oatleywells.com/2008/11/guitar-hero-iii.html#comment-3916847</link><description>She certainly kicked my ass on the first song we both played! I'm hoping that what I lack in skill I can compensate for with practice!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">philwells</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:05:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>